Difference between revisions of "About InContext QA"

From Lingoport Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Benefits)
(System Overview)
Line 16: Line 16:
   
 
= System Overview =
 
= System Overview =
[[File:InContext QA System Overview.jpg|800px]]
+
[[File:InContext QA System Overview.jpg|650px]]
  +
For an on-boarded repository, the happy path looks like:
  +
* Resource files are analyzed by Lingoport Resource Manager (LRM) and displayed in the Dashboard
  +
* Resource files which need to be translated are sent to the Translation Group
  +
* Translated resource files are received by LRM and pushed to the repo
  +
* Translated resource files are instrumented
  +
* The application with instrumented resource files are deployed to a Linguistic QA server
  +
* The reviewers navigate to the deployed instrumented application
  +
* The reviewers submit suggestions which are captured by LRM
  +
* LRM handles the retranslations

Revision as of 20:21, 26 June 2018

High Level Goals

The Lingoport InContext QA goals are:

  • Facilitate the translation review process of internationalized applications
  • Provide a simple way to review and edit translations of an application’s string resources in Chrome

The following is not a goal of Lingoport InContext QA:

  • Lingoport InContext QA does not replace how translation is done: It is not a TMS and not pretending to be one.

Benefits

  • Strings to review in context: live Web app
  • No software developer involvement
  • Easy, direct interaction from reviewer
  • Automatic updates
  • Light, minimal learning curve
  • Non-intrusive

System Overview

InContext QA System Overview.jpg For an on-boarded repository, the happy path looks like:

  • Resource files are analyzed by Lingoport Resource Manager (LRM) and displayed in the Dashboard
  • Resource files which need to be translated are sent to the Translation Group
  • Translated resource files are received by LRM and pushed to the repo
  • Translated resource files are instrumented
  • The application with instrumented resource files are deployed to a Linguistic QA server
  • The reviewers navigate to the deployed instrumented application
  • The reviewers submit suggestions which are captured by LRM
  • LRM handles the retranslations